QUESTION LIST #21
| To
list of all questions on Website |
Predestination; are fates
set in some cases?
Confusing the matter by calling the Giants
(children of the fallen angels) "Gibbor"; they are properly called Nephilim
Is it OK for Christians to celebrate
Christmas (and Easter) even though it has been Paganized?
A Reader asks about the money system during
the Tribulation
Jehovah's Witnesses New World Translation
Bible translation of John 1:1: "the Word was a god"
Are Kenites real? Where are they
today?
Does the book of Esther belong in the
Bible?
How can God speak to Jesus
if they are One?
The Tribulation;
Seals Trumps, and Vials, have they commenced (started) yet? How long is it
to be for?
|
To list of all questions on Website |
Question #1
| Back To Top |
Predestination; are fates set in some cases?
"is it an accurate assumption to say that even in our spiritual bodies we
have free will and can commit sin? Is this why some "evil" souls are placed
in certain corrupt bloodlines as they assume fleshly bodies here in this earth
age?"
Answer:
Hello, you asked a good deep question. The answer is yes, but I can't prove it to you. Please understand that this touches on
predestination in a way that most people cannot fathom nor would be willing to
accept, though the Bible is really all about predestination.
It's about - who is forever - and who is
not forever. I think that what happened in
the
rebellion in the age of old sealed many fates; and that people today, as we
know them, must just simply live it out; else the below Scriptures do not seem
fair:
John 6:44
44 No man can come to me,
except the Father which hath sent me draw him:
and I
will raise him up at the last day. (KJV)
John 3:16
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
(KJV)
The irony.
That there are some that were to be
born into their fate is clear:
Jude 4
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old
ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God
into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus
Christ. KJV
My opinion, drawn from the totality
of the Scriptures; and admittedly not able to be documented by any one
Scripture alone, as would have been desired; is that certain were fated to
work for satan, and certain were destined to work for God; and between these
two groups lies the overwhelming majority of people who have choice and free
will.
Those that I refer to as satan's,
would be the Kenites; and those that I refer to as God's, would be what we
(sometimes confusingly) refer to as God's Elect.
NOTE: Please do
not confuse "God's Elect" with all Christians. And please
understand that many times all Christians are referred to as the
Elect, but that within that group is a body of individuals that were
afore-ordained to work for God. A study on this is well overdue,
and when time permits we shall publish one here. Many people read
the scriptures wherein it mentions "the Elect" and "the Elect Lady,"
etc., and suppose that this is not speaking of the general body of
Christians, but only of a sub-group. This is an error. All
Christians are Elect, but there is a sub-group of these Elect that is
ordained from before the world began to work the purpose of God.
The difficulty is in how to know when it is speaking of the main group
or when it is speaking of the sub-group. More to come, someday....
The bottom line is that God is
fair; and that if there are some "who were before of
old ordained to this condemnation", and there are, then it is because
of what they did in the rebellion of the First Earth Age. What is the
condemnation? Observe as the Master tells us:
John 3:17-21
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but
that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not
is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the
only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into
the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds
were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the
light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be
made manifest, that they are wrought in God. KJV
Jude 4
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old
ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God
into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus
Christ. KJV
Bullinger has an appendix that goes
into this rebellion, I will reproduce it below my signature line.
God bless
the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
EXCERPT FROM:
"The Foundation of the
World"
Foundation of the World
This Is Appendix 146 From The Companion Bible.
To arrive at the true meaning of this expression, we must
note that there are two words translated "foundation" in the New
Testament:
(1) themelios, and
(2) katabole.
The Noun, themelios,
occurs in Luke 6:48-49,
14:29,
Acts 16:26,
Romans 15:20,
1Corinthians
3:l0-12,
Ephesians 2:20,
1Timothy
6:19,
2Timothy
2:19,
Hebrews 6:1,
11:10,
Revelation 21:14,19.
It is never used of the world (kosmos) or the
earth (ge). The corresponding Verb (themelioo)
occurs in Matthew 7:25,
Luke 6:48,
Ephesians 3:17,
Colossians 1:23,
Hebrews 1:10
and
1Peter
5:10.
The verb is only once used of the earth (ge).
Hebrews 1:10.
A comparison of all these passages will show that
these are proper and regular terms for the English words
"to found", and "foundation".
The Noun, katabole,
occurs in Matthew 13:35,
25:34,
Luke 11:50,
John 17:24,
Ephesians 1:4,
Hebrews 4:3,
9:26
, 11:11,
1Peter
1:20,
Revelation 13:8,
17:8
and the corresponding Verb (kataballo) occurs
in
2Corinthians
4:9,
Hebrews 6:1
and Revelation 12:10.
A comparison of all these passages (especially
2Corinthians
4:9
and Revelation 12:10)
will show that kataballo and katabole
are not the proper terms for founding and foundation, but
the correct meaning is casting down, or
overthrow.
Consistency, therefore, calls for the same translation in
Hebrews 6:1,
where, instead of "not laying again", the
rendering should be "not casting down". That is to
say, the foundation already laid, of repentance, etc., was not
to be cast down or overthrown, but was to be left and
progress made unto the perfection.
Accordingly, the Noun katabole, derived
from, and cognate with the Verb, ought to be translated "disruption",
or "ruin".
The remarkable thing is that in all occurrences (except
Hebrews 11:11)
the word is connected with "the world" (Greek
kosmos. Appendix 129.1), and therefore the
expression should be rendered "the disruption (or ruin)
of the world", clearly referring to the condition
indicated in Genesis 1:2,
and described in
2Peter
3:5-6.
For the earth was not created tohu (Isaiah
45:18) but became so, as stated in the Hebrew
of
Genesis 1:2 and confirmed by
2Peter
3:6,
where "the world that then was by the word of God"
(Genesis
1:1), perished and "the heavens and the earth which
are now, by the same word" were created (Genesis 2:4),
and are "kept in store, reserved unto fire against the
day of judgment" (2Peter
3:7)
which shall usher in the "new heavens and the new earth"
of 2Peter
3:13.
"The disruption of the world" is an event
forming a great dividing line in the dispensations of the ages.
In Genesis 1:1
we have the founding of the world (Hebrews 1:10
= themelioo), but in Genesis 1:2
we have its overthrow.
This is confirmed by a further remarkable fact, that the
phrase, which occurs ten times, is associated with the
Preposition apo = from (Appendix
104. iv) seven times, and with pro = before (Appendix
104. xiv) three times. The former refers to the
kingdom, and is connected with the "counsels"
of God; the latter refers to the Mystery (or
Secret; See Appendix 193) and is connected with the "purpose"
of God (see John 17:24,
Ephesians 1:4,
1Peter
1:20).
Ample New Testament testimony is thus given to the
profoundly significant fact recorded in Genesis 1:2,
that "the earth became tohu and bohu
(i.e. waste and desolate); and darkness was on the face of the
deep", before the creation of "the heavens and the
earth which are now" (2Peter
3:7). |
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #2
| Back To Top |
Confusing the matter by calling the Giants (children of the
fallen angels) "Gibbor"; they are properly called Nephilim
Shay asks:
"Was he (Jephthah) just a mighty man or is that gibbor in the
definition of
progeny of the fallen angels?????"
Answer:
Hi Shay, long time, no hear.
He (Jephthah) was just a mighty man, he was not of the fallen angels. Pastor Murray, in
my opinion, confuses the matter by calling the children of the fallen angels "Gibbor."
The confusion, I believe, is coming from a misunderstanding of the children of
the fallen angels. The fallen angels are the "sons of God," not the
Nephiylium (various English transliterations and spellings acceptable).
The Nephiyl (Nephiylium) are the offspring (children) of the fallen angels
(the sons of God), they get their name from "the fallen", i.e., the sons of
the fallen ones, so that while the sons of God ‘fell' their offspring are the
ones called the Nephiyl, which name means "fallen." It is common to call the
children by the attributes of the father. Observe:
"Giants" of Gen 6:4: Hebrew word #5303
nephiyl
(nef-eel'); or nephil (nef-eel');
from 5307; properly, a feller, i.e.
a bully or tyrant: KJV-- giant.
Hebrew word #5307
naphal (naw-fal'); a primitive root; to fall, in
a great variety of applications (intransitive or causative, literal or
figurative): KJV-- be accepted, cast (downself,, [lots], out), cease, die,
divide (by lot), (let) fail, (cause to, let, make, ready to) fall (away, down,
-en, -ing), fell (-ing), fugitive, have [inheritance], inferior, be judged [by
mistake for 6419], lay (along), (cause to) lie down, light (down), be (X hast)
lost, lying, overthrow, overwhelm, perish, present (-ed, -ing), (make to) rot,
slay, smite out, X surely, throw down.
Now to your word Gibbowr (or Gibbor, etc...), it is found in Gen 6:4 as
"mighty men." Observe:
"Mighty men" of Gen 6:4: Hebrew word #1368
gibbowr (ghib-bore'); or
(shortened) gibbor (ghib-bore'); intensive from the same as 1397; powerful; by
implication, warrior, tyrant: KJV-- champion, chief, X excel, giant, man,
mighty (man, one), strong (man), valiant man.
So that what we see is that while the children of the fallen angels are called
Nephillum, and that they became as mighty men (Gibbor), not all mighty men (Gibbor)
are children of the fallen angels. In other words, "Gibbor" is an attribute
of a person, while "Nephilium" is a name of persons (the giants of the
fallen angels).
A way to understand this would be in
the analogy of, say, that "all bankers are wealthy, but not all wealthy men
are bankers." You know what I am trying to show here?
Now bearing in mind that becoming a Gibbor (mighty man) is what happened to
the children of the fallen angels (Nephilim) but not all who become "mighty
men" (Gibbor) are children of the fallen angels.
Remember that Nimrod was also called a "mighty man" - "mighty one" (Gibbor)
though his lineage is from Cush by Ham, whom was from Noah, who was from Adam;
i.e., no lineage to the fallen angels.
Gen 10:8
8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a
mighty one [Gibbor] in the earth. (KJV)
In Gen 6:4 we see several words that are translated as "man" or "men" in the
Bible, each having a distinct meaning that is lost to the student through the
English language Bible. Observe:
Gen 6:4
4 There were
giants [Nephilim]
in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of
God [the fallen angels]
came in unto the daughters of men
[Adam], and they bare children to them, the
same became mighty men [Gibbor]
which were of old, men [Ish]
of renown [Shem].
(KJV)
Appendix #14 of the Companion Bible will help you with this. I have
reproduced it below my signaure line.
The Synonymous Words
used for "Man".
This Is Appendix 14 From The Companion Bible.
There are four principal Hebrew words rendered "man",
and these must be carefully discriminated. Every occurrence is
noted in the margin of The Companion Bible. They
represent him from four different points of view :-
- 'Adam, denotes his origin,
as being made from the "dust of the
Adamah" ground (Latin homo).
- 'Ish, has regard to sex, a male
(Latin vir).
- 'Enosh, has regard to his
infirmities, as physically mortal, and
as to character, incurable.
- Geber, has respect to his
strength, a mighty man.
|
I.
'Adam, without the article, denotes man or
mankind in general (Genesis 1:26;
2:5;
5:1,
followed by plural pronoun). With the article,
it denotes the man, Adam, though rendered "man"
in Genesis 1:27;
2:7
(twice)
8,15,16,19
(margin),
22
(twice); 3:12,22,24;
5:1;
6:1
(rendered "men"),
2,3,4.
After this, the Hebrew 'Adam = man or men, is
used of the descendants of Adam. Hence, Christ is called
"the son of Adam", not a son of Enosh.
With the particle
('eth) in addition to the article it is very
emphatic, and means self, very, this same, this very,.
See Genesis 2:7
(first occurrence),
8,15.
Rendered in the Septuagint
(anthropos) 411 times;
(aner) eighteen times (fifteen in Proverbs);
once
(thnetos), Proverbs 20:24
= dying; four times
(brotos), mortal (all in Job);
once
(gegenes), earth-born, Jeremiah
32:20.
II.
'Ish. First occurrence in feminine, Genesis
2:23,
'ishah = woman. Therefore,
'ish = male, or husband ; a man, in contrast with
a woman. A great man in contrast with ordinary men (Psalm
49:2,
where "low" are called the children of
Adam, and the "high" = children of
'ish. So Psalm 62:9
and Isaiah 2:9;
5:15;
31:8).
When God is spoken of as man, it is 'ish
(Exodus 15:3.
So Joshua 5:13.
Daniel 9:21;
10:5;
12:6,7.
Zechariah 1:8,
etc.). Also, in such expressions as "man of God",
"man of understanding", etc. In the early
chapters of Genesis we have it in chapters 3:22,24
and 4:1.
Translated in Septuagint 1,083 times by
(aner), Latin vir, and only 450
by
(anthropos), Latin homo.
It is rendered "husband" sixty-nine times,
"person" twelve times, and once or twice each
in thirty-nine different ways.
III.
'Enosh. First occurrence Genesis 6:4,
men of name. Always in a bad sense (Isaiah 5:22;
45:14.
Judges 18:25).
Morally = depraved, and physically =
frail, weak. It is from 'anash, to be sick,
wretched, weak, and denotes inability,
for strength, physically; and for good, morally (compare
2Samuel
12:15.
Job 34:6.
Jeremiah 15:18;
17:9;
30:12,15.
Micah 1:9).
Note the contrasts, Isaiah 2:11
and
17,
"The lofty looks of man ('Adam) shall
be humbled, and the haughtiness of men ('Enosh)
shall be bowed down" (compare Isaiah 13:12.
Job 25:6.
Psalms 8:4;
90:3;
144:3.
Job 4:17;
10:5;
7:17.
Daniel 4:16).
Other instructive passages are Isaiah 8:1;
66:24.
Ezekiel 24:17
(afflicted, or mourners. Compare Jeremiah 17:16,
"day of man"). In
1Samuel
4:9
it is probably plural of 'Ish (so probably
Genesis 18 and 19, where the indefinite plural must be
interpreted by the context, because 'Adam
would have denoted human, and 'Ish,
males).
It is rendered "man" 518 times, "certain"
eleven times, and once or twice each in twenty-four other
and different ways.
IV.
Geber. first occurrence in Genesis 6:4
1,
mighty men, and denotes man in respect of his
physical strength, as 'Enosh does in respect
of the depravity of his nature. It is rendered "man"
sixty-seven times, "mighty" twice, "man
child" once, "every one" once. In the
Septuagint rendered fourteen times
(anthropos) and the rest by
(aner).
For illustrative passages see Exodus 10:11;
12:37.
1Samuel
16:18.
2Samuel
23:1.
Numbers 24:3,15.
1Chronicles
26:12;
28:1.
2Chronicles
13:3.
Ezra 4:21;
5:4,10;
6:8.
V.
Methim
(plural) = adults as distinguished from children, and males
as distinguished from females. Occurs Genesis 34:30.
Deuteronomy 2:34;
3:6;
4:27;
26:5;
28:62;
33:6.
1Chronicles
16:19.
Job 11:3,11;
19:19;
22:15;
24:12;
31:31.
Psalm 17:14;
26:4;
105:12.
Isaiah 3:25;
5:13;
41:14.
Jeremiah 44:28.
NOTE
1
In Genesis 6:4,
we have three out of the above four words: "daughters of
men" (= daughters of [the man] 'Adam); "mighty
men" = (geber); "men of renown"
= Hebrew men ('Enosh) of name, that is to say,
renowned for their moral depravity.
Gen 6:4
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also
after that, when the sons of God came in unto the
daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the
same became mighty men which were of old, men of
renown. (KJV)
|
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #3
| Back To Top |
Is it OK for Christians to celebrate Christmas (and Easter)
even though it has been Paganized?
A Reader asks:
"Is it OK for Christians to celebrate Christmas even
though it has been Paganized."
Answer:
Regarding Christmas, I once wrote a reply to a Christian forum where they were
bashing Christians who celebrated Christmas. Perhaps you can glean something
of value from it:
Perhaps some have misunderstood me when I say that it is
Ok to honor our Lord and Savior in December and April (Christmas and Easter). I do not advocate heathen practices - God forbid, but much is done in
ignorance regarding religion. My point is that we should use those holidays
(that everybody celebrates) to witness that which Christ did on the cross for
them.
I know what you mean about the origins of some of the traditions regarding
Christmas and Easter, and yes, they are wrong. But the general mass of people
really believe in their heart that they are worshiping God in honor by
celebrating those holidays, and when they say Grace over their holiday meal it
is to God that they say it, not Woden (during Christmas) or Isthar
(during Easter). Their intentions are good,
and with God, intention means everything. God is a "Heart Knower," not a
legalist. If God were a
legalist, He would be very lonely in Heaven, because we would all be in 'Hell'.
I just think that when we Christians, who know better,
spend the holidays calling those who are ignorant to religious history―Heathen―we turn people off to Christ and God and most certainly to any message about
Them that we might have to share. In essence, we become the enemy of that
which we love―God and Christ Jesus―because hundreds of years ago the
Catholic church consolidated feasts with the heathen. The heathen will worship
whomever they wish, but do you really think that the majority of Biblically
illiterate America are in their hearts worshiping some pagan god or goddess?
And if they aren't, then why
don't we lovingly and with
patience teach them the truth in the context of the holiday season, instead of
haughtily throwing our weight around with our "much knowledge" about the
history of pagan feasts? There is much true Christian doctrine related to
those holidays, why don't we draw that to peoples remembrance instead of
throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Are we that vain, or do we seek to help gather others
into the Kingdom of God. My position on this is Biblical, observe Apostle Paul
teach that it is not good to let our deeper knowledge become a stumbling block to
others. We should take the time to read the below Bible chapter, for it is
written to us who do know better. You've got to love Apostle Paul, he really
gets it said, doesn't he! Oh, how he ‘‘hated'' a petty legalist:
Rom 14:1-23
1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations.
2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth
herbs.
3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which
eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he
standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him
stand.
5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike.
Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth
not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the
Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth
not, and giveth God thanks.
7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.
8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto
the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be
Lord both of the dead and living. 10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or
why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the
judgment seat of Christ.
11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me,
and every tongue shall confess to God.
12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather,
that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.
14 I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean
of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is
unclean.
15 But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not
charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died.
16 Let not then your good be evil spoken of:
17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace,
and joy in the Holy Ghost.
18 For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and
approved of men.
19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things
wherewith one may edify another.
20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is
evil for that man who eateth with offence.
21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby
thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
22 Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth
not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith:
for whatsoever is not of faith is sin. (KJV)
Have a heart Christians, these poor people in our modern
society don't know what their doing; for most of them the Holidays are the
most religious time in their spiritually empty lives, a time where when
perhaps only once or twice a year they actually think about God and Jesus and
what it all means. Don't we dare take that from them! Help them to
understand; you once did not know the truth, but somebody lovingly and with patience
took you by the hand and led you into the truth of the Gospel of Peace.
God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #4
| Back To Top |
A Reader asks about the money system during the
Tribulation
Answer:
Hi. I believe that at the end 'they'
will place all commerce on a voucher system wherein all will have an account.
And that any purchases and/or salaries are placed directly into this account.
In this manner they will be able to track every consumer (person). Even
today most employers are going to direct-deposit with the paychecks; and
most creditors offer automatic billing wherein they directly charge your
Bank Account monthly. So your paycheck goes into the bank and your
bills are paid without you doing anything, it is all automated. Need
cash? Put your card into the ATM machine and access your account 24hrs
a day, 365 days a year, from most anywhere in the world. We are much
more global financially than we realize.
Also, by this computerized system they will be able to cut-off anyone that they
wish from being able to buy or sell―they will just suspend their account.
They will also know the location of that purchase, should they want to arrest
that person. They will also be able to track the geographical location where
you are spending your credits. In this manner they know what store,
restaurant, coffee shop, or parking garage to find you at.
They can do this now with credit cards (and bank Debit cards that were instituted to
get all people on-board, even the poor and credit-less). In other words, those who could never get a credit
card can get a bank card which allows them to use their savings or checking
account as they would a credit card, except they must have the funds in the
account at the time of purchase, where with a credit card you are actually
borrowing the money at usury (interest).
They will be able to 'legally' cutoff anyone they wish by simply saying that
that person is wanted by the Police, or whatnot, for whatever trumped-up
charge they desire. The making of new laws is endless, and once a new law is
established, it is enforceable with the full arm of the police.
For instance, in England, Canada, Australia today you cannot so-called deny
the Holocaust under penalty of incarceration under the ever-widening so-called
"Hate Crime Legislation." So that what you have is that the Jews grossly exaggerated
the Holocaust story (Click E-Book link at right), made it a law that you must believe the lie, and then set
an apparatus in place where if you doubt the scope of the so-called Holocaust,
you are eligible for 3-5 years in prison for committing the so-called hate
crime of "Holocaust Denial." This they do to secure their
war-reparations payments. It was always only about $$$ and a Nation
State of Israel in Palestine (which both things they acquired after, and
because of, WWII).
Is it really that inconceivable, that in the future, to believe in the
God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ, that you will be legislated against and incarcerated for? No, it is
not at all inconceivable. For God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ, are
quite 'intolerant' by today's standards. And "we" can't have intolerance
in satan's New World Order, now can we?
The masses will go along with this system because the lower classes will be
given free credits as part of some social program. So naturally they will
participate because they will getting this welfare payment. Once the majority
are participating it is a small step to make it mandatory for 'efficiency's
sake.'
Regarding the mark of the beast, the jury is still out on this one for me.
Whatever it is, none will be able to buy or sell without it. The possibilities
are many. But it won't be some overt satanic symbol (not at the first, at
least) for they want all to get on board with it, and many won't take a 666
tattoo or whatnot.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Paying for drinks with
wave of the hand
Club-goers in Spain get implanted chips for ID, payment
purposes
April
14, 2004
By Sherrie Gossett
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Being recognized has never been easier for VIP patrons of
the Baja Beach Club in Barcelona, Spain.
Like a scene out of a science-fiction movie, all it takes is
a syringe-injected microchip implant for the beautiful men
and women of the nightclub scene to breeze past a "reader"
that recognizes their identity, credit balance and even
automatically opens doors to exclusive areas of the club for
them. .... |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
This is the problem that Applied Technologies is having getting their implant-chips accepted―too many people equate it with the
Biblical mark of the
beast. They are addressing this by slowly phasing it in, first in pets,
then high-profile people, then medical emergency cases, children susceptible
to kidnapping, etc. In an upscale club in Spain it is even trendy to
have an implant chip.
So, to be one of the "beautiful
people" you need to get chipped. People clearly are being
desensitized to being chipped (implanted with sensors, transmitters, and
location beacons) so that all will take this type implant.
When it is imposed mandatory, all true Christians will know the mark of the
beast (whatever it may be) for what it is, thus they
will resist and by that they will be located and arrested and executed
summarily in secret camps unknown to the masses of humanity (who wouldn't care
anyway, for by then Christians will have been vilified and called intolerant
exclusivist hate-mongers).
Many Christians will be located and arrested by the 'informer system,' of
which we saw just a little taste of in the Patriot Act where people (mail
clerks, etc.) were encouraged to report anyone 'suspicious' activity regarding Arab
Terrorists. In the end-time the Christians will be the 'terrorists' that need
to be 'caught' for the 'good' of society. If they offer to credit the account
of informers, many will turn in the 'archaic,' 'out of step,' Christians to
authorities for reeducation (really extermination at secret tribunals).
Can anyone say "mark of the beast?" "...and
cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be
killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free
and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads"
(Rev 13:15b-16).
Just keep your eyes open and be able to change your perceptions and suspicions
as fast as 'they' change their tactics. And they are ever-changing, trying to
find a chink in the armor of the world's citizenry, in order to bring
civilization to it's knees before satan.
The second (last) part of the
Tribulation:
Rev 13:10-18
10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth
with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the
faith of the saints.
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two
horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and
causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast,
whose deadly wound was healed.
13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven
on the earth in the sight of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles
which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that
dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had
the wound by a sword, and did live.
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image
of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship
the image of the beast should be killed.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond,
to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name
of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the
beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred
threescore and six. KJV
God bless
the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #5
| Back To Top |
Jehovah's Witnesses New World Translation
Bible translation of John 1:1: "the Word was
a god"
"...I have a
Jehovah's Witness friend
... He quoted Psalm 82 verse 6 as a scripture which means man has the
potential to become a "god" After reading this, I had no counter to his
argument though. What do you think of this?"
Answer:
Well, the
Jehovah's Witnesses use as their Bible the corrupt New World Translation.
In this translation John 1:1 says that "the Word
became a god", instead of as in the King James
Bible "the Word was God".
Likewise with your above mentioned Scripture (Psms 82:6) wherein the
Jehovah's
Witnesses Bible quotes it as "man has the potential to become
a "god","
the King James says "Ye are gods".
There is a difference. The word used here for "god" is elohiym which
in another place (Psm 8:5) is translated to "angels"
Ps 8:4-5
4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou
visitest him?
5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels [elohiym]
, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. (KJV)
Ps 82:6
6 I have said, Ye are
gods [elohiym]
; and all of you are children of the most High. (KJV)
gods: Hebrew word #430
'elohiym (el-o-heem');
plural of 433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the
plural thus, especially with the article) of the
supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and
sometimes as a superlative: KJV-- angels, X exceeding, God (gods)- dess, -ly),
X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
Below are other places that illustrate thatthe Hebrew word elohiym (God
or god) is not
always speaking of the One true God Yehovah (YHVH):
Exod 22:28
28 Thou shalt not revile
the gods [elohiym]
, nor curse the ruler of thy people. (KJV)
Ps 82:1
1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the
gods [elohiym]. (KJV)
Gen 30:8
8 And Rachel said, With
great [elohiym]
wrestlings have I wrestled with my sister, and I have prevailed:
and she called his name Naphtali. (KJV)
Gen 31:30
30 And now, though thou wouldest needs be gone, because thou sore longedst
after thy father's house, yet wherefore hast thou stolen my gods? [elohiym]
(KJV)
Exod 12:12
12 For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all
the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the
gods [elohiym]
of
Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD [Yehovah]
. (KJV)
Exod 20:23
23 Ye shall not make with me
gods [elohiym]
of silver, neither shall ye make unto you gods [elohiym]
of gold. (KJV)
Exod 22:8
8 If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought
unto the judges [elohiym]
, to see whether he have put his hand unto his neighbour's goods.
(KJV)
Exod 22:20
20 He that sacrificeth unto any
god [elohiym]
, save unto the LORD [Yehovah]
only, he shall be utterly destroyed. (KJV)
IKing 11:5
5 For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the
goddess [elohiym]
of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. (KJV)
Now getting back to our Scripture in question, i.e.,
Ps 82:6
6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. (KJV)
We see Jesus explain this Old Testament Scripture; going to the New Testament:
John 10:34-35
34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
35 If he called them
gods [no
article] , unto whom the word of God
[has the article] came, and the scripture
cannot be broken; (KJV)
Jesus uses the Greek article (the) with the second word "God" in the Scripture
showing that when He said that we were ‘gods" that were not the same as THE
God. The Strong's dictionary brings forth the importance of the Greek article,
observe:
God: Greek word #2316 theos
(theh'-os); of
uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with
NT:3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively, a magistrate;
by Hebraism, very:KJV - exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].
The Greek word (New Testament)
#3588 is the
article which does not always appear in the English translation but is so very
important in the Greek.
(The definite
article):
Greek word #3588 ho (ho); including the feminine he (hay);
and the neuter to (to); in all their inflections; the def. article;
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in
English idiom): KJV - the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc.
PS: Unlike
the English, the Greek has no such thing as an INdefinite article
(a, an); so
don't let the term "definite article" confuse you in that regard; the
‘article' in the Greek IS ALWAYS the ‘definite article' (the, that, this)―they are one in the same.
In the English the
indefinite article is rendered as: "god" (a god).
"
definite article is rendered as: "God" (The God).
So that in the Greek, the
lack of an article CONSTITUTES an indefinite article statement.
Observe:
In the Greek the
'indefinite article idea' is rendered as: "theos"
(a god).
"
definite article is rendered as: "ho Theos"
(The God).
Many (most) times the 'article' is exhibited in the English language as a
capitalization of the word, in the Greek New Testament Manuscripts there are no capital letters in
the Greek regarding the indication of the article, the manuscripts are all in
the same case (upper or lower) depending on the age of the manuscripts (In
fact, one classification of the GREEK Bible manuscripts are called the
"unicals" because they are all in uppercase letters; so
thus is the method and need for the Greek article to show emphasis
and to set aside certain words and ideas.)
So an analogy in our modern day English would be that if I write of a
"husband" in general I would write it in English as "husband." But if I were
referring to a specific woman's husband, I might illustrate that by placing it
in capitalization, or also by placing a demonstrative before it. Observe:
"Many husbands love their wives, but Sally loves only
her husband. The
men, the husbands of the Church Board, asked Mary, "Where is
your beloved, your Husband?"
In the above, in English, I relayed the fact that this particular man, this
Husband of Mary's, was apart from all other husbands on the earth, by using
the word "her" and "your" before the word husband.
Well, the Greek language has different rules, in the Greek the above paragraph
might look something like this transliterated:
"Many husband love wive, but Sally love
the [article] husband. men,
husband church board asked Mary, "Where beloved, the [article]
Husband?"
Ya know what I am trying to say? I hope that helps.
God bless
the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #6
| Back To Top |
Are Kenites real?
Where are they today?
A Reader asks a question about the Kenites:
(Note: She first
wrote-in doubting that the Kenite ever existed; and if they did, that
they certainly exist no more. She changed her mind on that, and
wrote back saying/asking):
"O.K., it's true. What are we supposed to DO about it? I believe the
Scriptures teach that we are to allow the tares to grow with the wheat
undisturbed until the end harvest when the ANGELS will gather, & bind
them. As Christians aren't we to know who they are, but leave them
alone? Else how can the Scriptures be fulfilled? Just wondering if I
have it right or need to rethink the whole matter?"
Well, what have I ever said to do to them (Kenites), except to know that they
do in fact exist? Israel of old was told to kill them all, but they
disobeyed God, and some of them instead mated with the Kenite, forever
destroying their descendants from out of Israel, God's beloved. That
is how the line got into a portion of Israel. It was they, at the head
of the Sanhedrin that killed Christ; it is they, at the end of the world,
that shall foment the Great Tribulation. Who did you think that it was
that the heads the seven global control regions, and the ten Kingdoms in
Revelation chapter thirteen were? Christians? Hardy!
Nothing changes; Cain killed Able,
Cain's descendants killed Christ, and their descendants shall kill
Christians in the Tribulation (they also killed many other Christians at
many other times in the world's history, but it is not for us here to go
into that lengthy subject). But why is this so hard to reason for so
many Christians today? They believe that evil exists, but yet they
cannot believe that an evil seed exists, though their Bibles tell
them so "And I will put enmity between thee and the
woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it
shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel" (Gen 3:15).
But they believe that a holy seed exists―this they errantly figure to
be the so-called modern day Jews. Go figure! The irony!
I believe that while the Kenite
always traveled close to Israel, that it was during the Babylonian Captivity
that the Kenite firmly entrenched itself into Judah by intermarriages.
Also, it was at that time (circa 500 B.C.) that the Jewish Babylonian Talmud
first started to be codified. This Talmud now eclipses the Old
Testament Hebrew Scriptures for the majority of modern-day global Jewry (a
notable exception is the negro Ethiopian Jews, who reject Talmud and stick
to only the Old Testament Hebrew scriptures―and for this of course,
modern-day Jewry rejects them, and will not ordain them nor allow them to
officiate at weddings, funerals, etc.). To see the sheer and utter
spiritual and moral depravity of the Jewish Babylonian Talmud, see our:
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE
TALMUD: A Documented Exposé of Jewish Supremacist Hate Literature.
(Kids under 18, don't you even look at their "holy" book, for the
profaneness of it.)
Is all of this antiSemitic?
Do be so ridiculous and shallow; see our:
WBSG's position on
AntiSemitism, so-called. While the Kenite is
foremost a Jew, yes, but he is a Satanist Jew; and remember that all Jews
are not Kenites. The Kenite hides within Jewry, but is a separate
people. It was the Kenite that sacrificed the Jews in WWII Europe, and
many Jews are waking up to this fact. That fact being that
International Jewry abandoned the Jews in Europe to Hitler, and even
financed Hitler; and when Hitler had offered to ransom the entirety of
European Jewry out of Europe for a paltry 20 million dollars―the rich
International Jews rejected the offer, because, in their own words:
|
The below, from
the Zionist Jewish Agency Executive Offices in
Switzerland, during WWII, was in reply to the call
of the Jewish Rescue Committee in Czechoslovakia
for help, with documentary evidence furnished,
concerning the fate of millions of Jewish people in Nazi
occupied Europe. |
 We
are writing to remind you of the one factor of which you
must never lose sight: that ultimately, the Allies will
win the war [WWII]. After their victory,
territorial boundaries will be reshaped as they were
after the First World War.
Then, the way will be clear for our purpose
at this time, with the war drawing to a close, we must
do everything in our power to change Eretz Yisroel to
Medinat Yisrael and many steps have already been taken
in this regard. Therefore, we must turn a deaf
ear to the pleas and cries emanating from Eastern
Europe. Remember this: all the allies have
suffered many losses,
and if we also
do not offer human sacrifices, how can we gain the right
to sit at the conference table when the territorial
boundaries are reshaped?
Accordingly, it is foolhardy and brazen for us to
negotiate in terms of money or supplies in exchange for
Jewish lives. How dare we ask of the allied powers
to barter money for lives while they are sustaining
heavy casualties daily? So, insofar as the masses
are concerned: RAK B'DAM TIHJE LANU HAAREZ, (Eretz
Yisroel [land of Israel] will be ours only by
paying with blood), but as far as our immediate
circle is concerned, ATEM TAJLU [you escape].
The messenger bearing this letter will supply you with
funds for this purpose.
― MIN
HAMETZAR (p. 92) by Rabbi Michael Dov
Weissmandl ZT"L. Dean of
Nitra Yeshiva. The excerpt is a literal translation of the
letter
the Jewish Rescue Committee in
Czechoslovakia received
from the Zionist Jewish
Agency Executive
Offices in Switzerland.
|
See the source of the above quotation from our website
article: The
Unthinkable: Truth Suppressed! Zionists Jews sacrifice WW II European Jews
for Palestinian Homeland, and
JEWS NOT ZIONISTS WEBSITE
(Please don't get your theology there, it will kill your soul.)
So we see that all Jews are not the
same people; and to speek out about the Zionists or the Kenites is not to
speak against Mr. & Mrs. average everyday "Jew." The average Jew s the
victim of the Kenite, though the Kenite identifies himself as a Jew.
Confusing? It really isn't. It is the same model like their (Kenite's)
Satanic Illuminati, Illuminati hid within Free Masonry,
separate and apart; just like the Kenites hide within Jewry separate and
apart; just like they did in the Old Testament with Israel:
"And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez;
the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the
Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab."
(1 Chron 2:55).
And don't worry about people hurting the Kenite, the Kenite shall (and always
has) hurt the peoples of God. God saw to it that they would always make
it through; in the beginning He set a mark upon Cain that none could kill
him. In the end satan shall require God's people to take a mark of the
beast―is this some kind of mocking tit-for-tat? I don't know.
Do you know who the Kenite is?
You should, for he has a very active
part in your life; you are enslaved to him and do not even perceive it.
He ultimately holds the note on your car and home; he sets the price
for your food and oil; the interest rates for your money which you let him
use to make his money. He makes your laws, runs your country's war
machine; he makes Presidents, and "pro-choice" laws; he stirs racial animosity, he is
the guarantor on your insurance policies, he's also your taxer. He tells you what is
acceptable for you to think and say, and then sets up the apparatus
(Political Correctness, 'hate' speech laws, etc.) to condemn and punish you when you disobey.
There is nothing in your life that he does not control. He corrupts your
churches, he takes away your crosses from government lands that you fund, he
takes God out of your schools and inserts 'alternative lifestyle' reeducation
in His place. He is your master and yet he is invisible. He has muddled your
history books, omitted the true and inserted lies. He drew the Christian
nations into war against each other in the Worlds Wars. He foments all wars
and revolutions―he is above all a revolutionary―for his credo is, "Destroy
everything; whatever is, is wrong."
"...This second movement aims for
the establishment of a new racial domination of the world...the
moving spirits in the second scheme are Jewish radicals. Within the
ranks of Communism is a group of this party, but it does not stop there.
To its leaders Communism is only an incident. They are ready to use the
Islamic revolt, hatred by the Central Empire of England, Japan's designs
on India and commercial rivalries between America and Japan. As any
movement of world revolution must be, this is primarily
anti‑Anglo‑Saxon...The organization of the world Jewish radical
movement has been perfected in almost every land." ―
The Chicago Tribune, June 19, 1920.
He poisons your children with unsafe (and unnecessary) drugs and inoculations,
he poisons (sedates/makes docile) you with fluoride in your water,
emasculates your men with feminizing hormones in your plastic food containers
and masculinizes your women with other chemicals. He was behind the women's movement, the racial
integration laws, the Social Welfare System―he is above all a Marxist
Communist.
"Some call it Marxism ― I call it Judaism."
― The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5,
1935.
And he is not done with you. His motto is, "Out of chaos, order."
Thus he must destroy your world so that his may rise from it's ashes: "Pluralistic
chaos, out of which the Phoenix of the New World ORDER can arise.
Resurrected from the ashes of the Mysteries of the past.". He
above all promotes social reforms, for they all play into his hand of
destroying everything that was once holy, true, and good.
He is the friend of the gay, the lawless, the Atheist, the criminal; he shall
make your world theirs. He is the enemy of Christianity, God, and Jesus
Christ; he seeks to make that world his own and his god satan's. He attacks
every tenant of your Christian Bible, yet he is esteemed as the chosen of God
by the ignorant and the indifferent. The Bible paints a very different
picture of these people and their great-ancestor satan, the serpent of old.
Gen 3:14-15
14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou
art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy
belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and
her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. (KJV)
The
Kenite is everything spiritually and morally vile. Don't weep
for his safety, he wants you dead. And in the end, for a little while, his
god and father Lucifer shall rule the world―then Christian beware! You
have absolutely not seen anything yet by comparison.
Matt 24:21-22
21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of
the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved:
but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. (KJV)
You ask if we are not to harm or hinder them? You couldn't, he already
possesses you, what can the slave do to the master? Only God can set things
strait, and He shall at the appointed time.
Just open your eyes and try to protect yourself until the time. And pray. Study the
Word and pray.
God bless
the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at
top of page
Question #7
| Back To Top |
Does the book of Esther belong in the Bible?
"I had a couple of
questions to ask concerning this book [Esther],
I was actually kind of disturbed when I finished reading it."
Hello. As many know, the name
of "God" or "Lord" does not appear even one time in the book of Esther.
And I reject the Companion
Bible's assertion that it is hidden in acrostics―seems a little too
convenient (made up after the fact?) and Kabalistic to me. Especially
as there is no rhyme nor reason as to how the so-called acrostics are
located. It is as though someone just looked through the book for a
couple of instances where certain words followed one another. Remember
that Bullinger was a friend of the converted Jew Ginsburg, and that Ginsburg
was studied in the Cabbala (Kabbalah). This type of counting and letter
sequencing seems very Kabalistic. I just don't like the feel of
it, at all; it seems eerily reminiscent of the "Bible Code" type spurious
books. "...no lie is of the truth" (1
John 2:21b).
Esther is a curious book, indeed.
The Shepherd's Chapel has a 4-tape series on the book of
Esther. It never appears on TV because of the explosive nature of the info on
the book. You can call or write the Chapel and ask for the series on by name
and they will send it to you. It is 4 tapes at $4.00 each, and maybe give three
or four
dollars donation to cover shipping. It is well worth the $20.00, as he covers
Esther verse by verse and shows that the Kings and the people named in Esther
didn't exist when compared to other contemporary Bible characters in the book
of Daniel and the book of Ezra which were from the same time frame.
He does not say that the book shouldn't be in the Bible, but rather he seems
to allude to it showing the method of the Kenite (Though I don't speak for
the man. You get the tapes and come to your own conclusion.)
Bullinger, in his
Companion Bible footnotes, points out many/most of these conflictions,
though he tends to be an apologist for them. It seems that Bullinger
and myself have come to different conclusions regarding the purpose of the
book of Esther.
I myself am not so sure that it is a reliable book in that it contains
inaccuracies; but I am reluctant to say
that it doesn't belong in the Bible because of the implications of such a
thing in the minds of some who would not understand. This is not to
say that God did not allow this book into the Bible, just that perhaps He
did not Author it's words or sanction what it taught therein.
Let me explain. In Genesis
chapter three, we see satan utter lies:
Gen 3:4-5
And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be
opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. KJV
Now, if someone were to say that
what satan said in Genesis 3:4-5 above, has to be true because it is in the
Bible; they would be missing the point. God allowed satan's lies in Gen
3:4-5 into
the Bible TO SHOW US HOW SATAN OPERATES. We see this same phenomenon
when satan misquotes Scripture to Christ in the wilderness, in the Gospels.
Does that mean that the error is chargeable to God or His Bible? No,
it just means that God is relaying what was said by another.
God never claims to speak in the
book of Esther. So what is said, when wrong, is not chargeable to God.
We see something along these lines where God allows a lying spirit to be
sent to reprobate men who refuse the truth from the Holy Spirit of God (1st
Kings 22:22-23, 1st Chron 18:21-22). God will allow one to believe a
lie if they reject the truth. Does not the New Testament even tell us
so: "And for this cause God shall send them strong
delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who
believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." (2
Thess 2:11-12); you see the guilt all over those who God was stirred to send
delusion. These are not innocent Bible students who just "didn't get
it," they did not believe the truth of God; and worse, they amused
themselves in vain fables (perhaps leading others astray with them?).
This will most likely be a common event during the Tribulation, with the
know-it-alls and the self-righteous.
So too did God, I believe, allow
the Jew's lies into the Bible, in the form of the book of Esther; to show
how they operate. So, while what is in this book (Esther) may not be
true history, it is in there to teach us what they had done (and have done
all down through time). What do I mean "have done all through time?"
I am sure that you have been taught that the poor Jews were just
harassed and attacked by Germany for no apparent reason, right? Well
there was an apparent reason for Germany to want to expel the Jews from her
border, as so very many other European countries had expelled them at one
time or another. That was Hitler's Final Solution, deportation,
not extermination). Many people are unaware that between 250
A.D. and 1948 A.D., there were 108 Jewish Expulsions (Deportations) from
various countries, mostly from Europe. Click on the picture at right,
for full-size list of these 108 expulsions.
The Holocaust exaggeration, and the outright re-written history of the matter,
is one glaring modern-day example. Many people do not know that the
 so-called
six-million lie was used as justification for the slaughter of millions of
Germans at the close of the war. Type "Dresden" into your search
engine for a taste of Jewish vengeance and bloodlust. Dresden was a
German city which was not a military target; had no industry, war materials
or otherwise; nor any
garrisoned troops; it was a city full of German women and children
war-refugees streaming to safety near the end of the war. At the
insistence of the International Jews, the Allies firebombed the entire city
of Dresden, killing most all the German women and children in the inferno
(holocaust). Yes, Virginia, the Jews (the International ones) wielded
much power in WWII, and even brought that war about for their own designs.
Notice the date on the above facsimile of the Daily Express
newspaper Front-page of March, 24, 1933, heralding the declaration of
economic war upon Germany by International Jewry; This was BEFORE World War
Two!)
How amazingly absurd this must sound to the reader who has been brainwashed
by rewritten history and the Anti-Semitism bogey and myth. For a quick
little (real) history of WWI and WWII, especially see:
A
Jewish Defector Warns America by Benjamin H.
Freedman. Observe the
dates on the below quotes from the annals leading up to the world's second
great war, World War II, which was fought from 1939-1945:
"...Jabotinsky insisted that all energies be expended to force the Congress
to join the boycott movement [the boycott movement was the
subject of the above newspaper
headline]. Nothing less than a 'merciless fight'
would be acceptable, cried Jabotinsky. 'The present Congress is duty
bound to put the Jewish problem in Germany before the entire world...(We
[Jews]
must) destroy, destroy, destroy them, not only with the boycott, but
politically, supporting all existing forces against them to isolate Germany
from the civilized world...our enemy [Germany]
must be destroyed." ―
Speech by Vladimir Jabotinsky, a Polish Jew, on June 16, 1933.
"The fight against
Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every
conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world.
There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of
general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the
whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again
a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies.
But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..."
― Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934.
"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred.
The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all
German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a
complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and
retaliation towards every German, woman and child." ― Jewish
professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937.
"The millions of Jews
who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to
forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation
against Germany to its final end." ― [The Jewish newspaper]
Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939.
"Kill the Germans, wherever you
find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women,
children, or the aged! Kill every German―wipe them out!"
― Llya Ehrenburg [Jewish], Glaser, p. 111. (undated).
"...In
Germany the Jews occupy the principal riles and are first-rate
revolutionaries. They are writers, philosophers, poets, orators,
publicists, and bankers, and on their heads and in their hearts all the
weight of ancient ignominy! They will one day be terrible for
Germany...probably followed by a morrow terrible for them." ―
Rougeyron, 1861; Metternich, 1849; "The Trail of the Serpent," Inquire
Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 93.
Also during the final moments of
WWII (in Germany), a Russian General (Jewish) in the advancing Russian Red army, said
upon the final assault of the German homeland, something to the effect of
"The German Hag is in for a rough night," or words to that
effect. [sorry, can't locate the exact quote at this moment―but I have it in
some book or other.] A "hag" is a derogatory word for a women.
What he meant was that the Jewish controlled Russian Red Army was going to
rape it's way through Germany. And they did. Also, remember that
millions ended up in the Russian (Jewish run) Gulags in Siberia, never to be seen alive
again.
Typical Jewish hate-slaughter, just
like the book of Esther illustrates. Coincidence? Or was this
the reason that God allowed the book of Esther into the Old Testament?
Even though that in not even one place in the book of Esther do we see it written "Thus saith
the Lord, ..." or "God did this, or God did that...," or,
"Esther and Mordecia prayed to God and the Lord said/did..."
Nothing! No reference to God at all. No you can see why the Jews
who set the cannon and who preserved the writings, needed to "find" the name
of God in the book of Esther by "acrostic." Sorry, God doesn't operate
like that.
God was not the actor in the
book of Esther, He was not influencing the events; nor was He once consulted
by the Jews in the book when things looked bleak for Jewry. Why do you
think that that is? It is because by then, the so-called Jews hated
God and turned their backs on Him. And when He would come in the flesh
as Jesus Christ, some 400 years later, they would go on to kill Him.
Nowhere in the book itself does it
claim that God had any hand in the 'events' of the book of Esther. It
was written by Jews who had turned their back on God because He let the
Temple fall and Judah be taken into captivity. It was this spirit and
mindset that allowed, at this precise time in history, for the Jews to begin
compiling their Babylonian Talmud, which is a mirror-image opposite of the
Hebrew Old Testament. They had by this time completely renounced God.
God allowed their spurious writing (Esther) to be, for all time, a testament
to their sin and their manner. Yet foolish Christians today, believing
the lies about the so-called modern day Jews being the "chosen of God,"
cleave to the Jew as their "brother in faith." Fools! Harsh
word? No, true. The modern day Jew and his corrupt religion
Judaism is against all that God had intended from any people of His who would
be "called by His name" (Christians are named after Christ, who was God in
the flesh. Thus, Christians are those that are called by God's name). An earlier example of Purim type
murder, slaughter, and intrigue, would be Jew's Russian Bolshevik
Revolution, where they, in the Jewish-led overthrow, after seizing
control of the government through a Jew-fomented revolution; systematically
exterminated some 60-100 million Christians―all in the name of the
so-called Anti-Semitism bogey man. What a perfect parallel to what
they say happened in the book of Esther. Could it be that the book
of Esther was fabricated to cover-up the slaughter of so many non-Jews in
Medio-Persia? God only knows.
|
|
 ...The Russian
Author, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, relates that some sixty-million
"real Russians" have been murdered since the Bolshevik Revolution at
the hands of the Yiddish [Jewish] revolutionaries.
―
WHO IS ESAU-EDOM?
by Charles A. Weisman;
pg. 104. |
Is it a coincidence that the same
type of false-AntiSemism charges, which led to the slaughter of untold
numbers of non-Jew souls, by the Jews in the book of Esther, was repeated
all down through history; and that God was warning us of their tactics?
Even today the Jews are strengthening their hand world-wide with draconian
so-called AntiSemitism laws and bizarre so-called hate-speech laws, which
make the very thought of criticizing a Jew―a crime punishable (now) by
imprisonment. In 1917 Russia―as millions of once-Christian Russians
found out―the punishment for perceived or
contrived AntiSemitism was a single bullet to the base of the skull in your
own front-yard, in front of your own family (if they weren't also
exterminated with you). It appears from Scripture, that during the Tribulation,
beheading is to be the new
Jewish bullet to the base of the
skull.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Step by step, I
have arrived at the conviction that the aims of [Jewish birthed]
Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg
Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi
Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the
German People did not want war. But we, [England]
declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with
our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the
Americans [influential Jews] around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's
pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize
that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of
Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power
of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see
that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued
now, only under a different label."
―
British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, in a speech at
Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As one searches history,
competently, and without Jewish subte |