QUESTION LIST; Page Number 67
| To list of all questions on Website |

   

  1. Is Pres. G. W. Bush really a Christian?  Is it remotely possible that 911 wasn't an inside job (Thermate cutter-charges)?

  2. Presidential Candidate Ron Paul and American politics

  3. On July 12, 2007, for the first time in 220 years, the United States Congress was opened with a prayer by a Hindu clergyman to his pantheon of false gods.

  4. Marriage, divorce, and "living in sin" in God's eyes

  5. Antichrist's (satan's) hierarchy

  6. Men as trees

  7. Boundaries? Husband and wife intimacy: "Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled" [Caution, mature subject matter]

  8. Has God accepted me, has He forgiven me, is He angry with me?

  9. Pending

| To list of all questions on Website |

 
 

Question #1

| Back To Top |

Is Pres. G. W. Bush really a Christian?  Is it remotely possible that 911 wasn't an inside job (Thermate cutter-charges)?

 

A reader writes:

Hey, what do you think about the whole 9/11 issue?  Do you think our government had a hand in doing this?

Just wondering.

I always value your opinion.  I think Bush is nothing more then a pawn in these end times and I feel sorry for him because he is taking all the guff from all angles.

I talked to my brother who is a pilot and he said they could make the turns and such the critics claim cant be done with a plane like that, once it is in the air its like driving a car, most of it is automatic .

 

Answer:

Hi Xxxxxx.  Sorry to take so long answering.  You asked:

"Hey, what do you think about the whole 9/11 issue?  Do you think our government had a hand in doing this?"
  If I could change the form of your question, then the answer would be: Yes, absolutely; there is no other way that it could have been carried out.  The form that I would have to change your question into to make that answer applicable would be:
"Do you think that the hidden hand that is over American (as well as much of Europe's) government orchestrated the 911 attacks through their absolute control and domination of those nation's upper levels of security and spy agencies?"
    The answer is yes.  The International Judaics have long been in control of our CIA, FBI (upper level only), and NSA, and now the newly constituted Homeland Security office.  As well, in England they have controlled the MI-5 (upper level only) and MI-6 (SIS) for even longer than they have controlled America's CIA and NSA.  Judaics covertly control the Spy/Security offices of most all major countries; that's how they control wars and international relationships.  And that is how both (Judaic-controlled) Russia and (Judaic-founded) Israel got the Atomic Bomb shortly after America developed it—Jewish spies.
 
    Did you ever wonder why all nations have Embassies, when everyone knows that Embassies are the bases out of which all spies communicate and pass secrets?  It is because the Judaics set up an international system whereby they could infiltrate every nation and penetrate their security defenses.  Embassies are considered foreign soil and thus are not permitted to be searched or entered-into by the host nation. 
 
    By design (and necessity) these spy/Security agencies operate under a cloak of secrecy; and it is there that the Judaics excel.

Note:  As of approximately the last six years (at the time of [before?] 911, I might add!) the International Judaics need not even spy on us or control our government security and spy agencies to compromise America.  Why?  Because we now pay them to gather, process, interpret, and deliver our intelligence.  In other words, we have outsourced to private corporations our intelligence apparatus.  Please don't have ask who owns those multi-continental, multi-billion dollar corporations!

    Could this be the underlying explanation for the faulty intelligence that Pres. Bush (and Congress, and the United Nations) was given on Nigerian Yellowcake Uranium and weapons of mass destruction?  Could this be why we are in the Iraq dismantling another one of Israel's enemies?  And that Pres. Bush, being not that bright of a fellow, is only a pawn being blamed for "lying about WMD"?!?  Things are becoming a lot more clear here; and below is major piece of the puzzle.  Observe:

Outsourcing Intelligence
 By R.J. Hillhouse
The Nation
July 24, 2007
LINK

The unprecedented involvement of private corporations in the Iraq War has been well documented. Private soldiers working for Blackwater USA, Triple Canopy and others provide security services against military-level threats, and they regularly engage in combat. But what is not generally known is that the secret side of the Iraq War and the larger "war on terror" is also conducted by private corporations, fielding private spies. The reach of these corporations has extended into the Oval Office. Corporations are heavily involved in creating the analytical products that underlie the nation's most important and most sensitive national security document, the President's Daily Brief (PDB).

Over the past six years, a quiet revolution has occurred in the intelligence community toward wide-scale outsourcing to corporations and away from the long-established practice of keeping operations in US government hands, with only select outsourcing of certain jobs to independently contracted experts. Key functions of intelligence agencies are now run by private corporations. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) revealed in May that 70 percent of the intelligence budget goes to contractors.

For all practical purposes, effective control of the NSA is with private corporations, which run its support and management functions. As the Washington Post's Walter Pincus reported last year, more than 70 percent of the staff of the Pentagon's newest intelligence unit, CIFA (Counterintelligence Field Activity), is made up of corporate contractors. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) lawyers revealed at a conference in May that contractors make up 51 percent of the staff in DIA offices. At the CIA, the situation is similar. Between 50 and 60 percent of the workforce of the CIA's most important directorate, the National Clandestine Service (NCS), responsible for the gathering of human intelligence, is composed of employees of for-profit corporations. . . . This is particularly frightening when one considers that the "war on terror" is fought by a $100 billion-plus [PRIVATE] industry that has a vested interest in its continuation.... [Continued at LINK]

    I wonder why our "patriotic" President and Congressmen never told us about this obvious "backdoor"?  And why would any sane patriotic American President and Congressman allow this to be approved and to go forward?!?  Could it be that they are traitors, or just idiots?  Well, they aren't idiots.  That leaves only....

    And don't let it be lost on the reader that those above agencies (NSA, CIA, DIA, CIFA, etc.) that are now collectively 70% owned, controlled, run, and staffed by private multi-national (International) corporations, are the same ones that are executing all the "Domestic Surveillance" programs that we keep hearing about.  The "Patriot Acts," etc didn't protect Americans, it put us under International Judaic surveillance and control.  In other words, the International Judaics, through their control of these corporations that do most of America's spying at home and abroad,  have real-time access to personal data on every person in America (and this is happening all over the Christian Western Nations), and the authority to gather more info and to conduct electronic surveillance on them.  Now you don't have to wonder how antichrist and his International Judaics knows where to find all the Christians during the Tribulation—they (you!) are all in his database!

Footnote
1  See the two "Patriot Acts," and the below, etc.

And the latest one:
 2   Executive Order Overturns U.S. Fifth Amendment

      Regarding Bush.  Yes, he is a pawn, a beautiful idiot even, but he is far from innocent.  He is purposely setting up the Martial Law apparatus (I have the bills listed on the Website, all five of them1, then now he made the new one2 that implies that "obstructing" the actions in Iraq means that you get all your property confiscated.  How long will it take to charge anti-war leaders and protest leaders with "obstructing the actions in Iraq "?  There is a purpose for every secret law that Bush, through his "Executive Privilege," signs into being.

 

    And the controlled-Congress, Supreme Court, most everybody in power!—99% of them lawyers who should know better—are purposely pretending not to notice what Bush is rearing-up.  These men—these American leaders—are traitors, they are guilty of Capital Offence crimes.  They are held in place by bribes, black-mail, and fear.  They have sold America's policy to a foreign nation—Israel!  High Treason is one of the very few Federal crimes that carries the death sentence.  (See 6 Min. video on AIPAC and Zionist control of U.S. Government and so-called "Christian" church leaders:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JMuNNHnT1w)

 

    On a video recently John McCain pretended to not to have ever heard of the position that some people think that 911 was an inside job.  Now, McCain is a Presidential Candidate—but one would have to live under a rock to not at least know that some are challenging the official explanations of 911.  Ergo, McCain lied through his teeth.  But why, that is the question.

 

    And on the recent much touted CNN YouTube debates, out of I believe the 37 or 47 that were used, not one question was selected about the 911-Truth Movement for airing.  Now, go to YouTube and type in "911" in the search engine—there are, as of this moment, 204,000 (I just checked) 911 related videos.  Are we to believe that out of the 3000+ video submissions to CNN by YouTube film makers that none of them asked about 911???  No, they just screened out those videos.  But, why, is the question to ask.

Note about the "911 Truth Movement":  They have been infiltrated by Judaic operatives who claim (pretend) to be part of the movement.  These straw men are posting absurdities all over Internet chat rooms and forums like, "There were no planes at all used in 911," etc.  These are shills who are trying to discredit the 911 Truth Movement (no one specific group meant). Don't fall for it! They are the International Judaic's solution to the 911 Truth Movement; it is a game, and your mind is the prize.  The real 911 Truth Movement people are very sound, well documented, and present their case in a mature respectful manner (many of them are PHD's in the fields of Science, Physics, Metallurgy, etc., they are not all a bunch of twenty-something rebels!).  All others are shills to scare YOU away from what the 911-Truthers are proving so ably.  Should this be confusing to you? No, but do understand that if you are going to unravel International Judaic conspiracies you had darn well better be able to think on your feet and see information and intelligence for what it is. Listen, you cannot let other people make up your mind for you, that is what the International Judaics have counted on since they gained control of all media venues—without you even realizing it, they are giving you your opinion.

    I believe that Bush has been promised that he would be President when the takeover happens, and that he would be dictator.  I also believe that he has been lied to, and that he will be assassinated once he completes his task of placing America under military rule.  Then the International Judaics OWN America by whatever puppet they put in place.  And then they own every life within America's borders.  That's the plan, anyway.

 

    The International Judaics have shifted focus off of America as the final Empire and are now, as I am beginning to see it, moving plans back into Europe and the European Union as the seat of the beast.  Until now America was doing everything that the beast in Revelation was to do, we "lit-up" nations that are mentioned in the Bible endtimes, we controlled the world's finances, we were the lone super-power, we were confederated and in league with most of the world, we set up the United Nations, .... 

 

    But just wait until Bush does Iran (Persia in the Bible), then the stuff shall really hit the fan.  Bush stated that he did not want to leave Iran an undone deal before he leaves office in 18 months.  What do you think that means!  

 

    But now, If I am seeing things right, that "honor" (of world seat of power) is going back to Judaic-controlled Europe. Watch for that.  But the real end game is for that power to settle in Jerusalem, then we are close to the end.  Watch also for that.  And watch Russia, she is rising and she is strong.  Russia is evil and is Judaic controlled—has been since the 1917 Revolution.  If you believe the lie about so-called AntiSemitism in Russia and Europe then you are just buying into the lie, into the diversionary tactic.  The International Judaics OWN lock, stock, and barrel, both Russian and Europe; they are not persecuted there!  All the rich "Oligarchs" in Russia, that you hear so much about, that own the vast wealth of Russia, are Jews.  The "Russian Mafia" is a Jewish Mafia.

 

    And Russia is not done fulfilling prophecy.

 

    America as a power isn't seen in Revelation for a reason.  I believe that after the turmoil, America will be the "wilderness" where true-Israel ("the woman;" i.e., Christians) is carried to in Revelation 12.  But that is just my opinion at this time.  I cannot now prove it, so take it as opinion, speculation, or whatever.

 

    George W. Bush is not a Christian, he is a Satanist.  He just claims to be a Christian so we stupid Christians support him.  He is—and has admitted to being—Skull and Bones.  S & B is an Illuminati organ, they are pure Satanists.  The Bohemian Grove is a place where many of the world's leaders (including the Bush's) go, and there they perform a mock human sacrifice (I have Alex Jones’s undercover video on it, they really did it! [ Video is here, the visuals clear up after the first two minutes, watch the whole 9 Min. video] [Part two HERE; where at 6:15 Min. they burn the screaming "effigy"]  Some feel that there are real human sacrifices here and deeper in the woods, which makes total sense, but why speculate?  The point is, is that; I'm sorry, but Christians do not participate in mock human sacrifices.  They just don't.  And anybody who does participate in them isn't a Christian.  They just aren't.  It really is that simple.  "...Judge a tree by its fruit..."  Simple!

Bohemian Grove Membership:  For an excellent 4:52 Min. video showing pictures of the Bohemian Grove and pictures of members, see Bohemian Grove Membership.  After seeing so many of the famous men of the world that are Grovers, much of the conspiracy to overthrow America and control the world for antichrist/satan shall be crystal clear.

    In his initiation to Skull and Bones, Pres. Bush had to drink (God knows what) out of a real human skull.  He had to sleep in a coffin.  These are not things that a Christian would do.  G. W. Bush has hoodwinked Christians, including dear Pastor Murray—that is exactly why the International Judaics chose him to be President.  That, and the fact that he is stupid and vain and easily led.  When the dust settles there shall be a lot of Christians feeling betrayed and duped by George Bush.  But it will be too late for them, they will be being persecuted and garrisoned in "relief camps."  Why do Americans feel that this is so impossible or far-fetched?  Has not history even yielded us many such examples?

 

    Regarding the plane piloting on 911: I respect your brother's opinion, but did he mean that he, an experienced pilot, could turn those planes and bring them on target at the very limits of their structural capacity; or, did he mean that the purported pilots, those Arabs that couldn't even handle a small Cessna well, could do it?

 

    Even if you or I could do it (doubtful), that does not explain why they were allowed to roam above America for so long without being intercepted.  You do remember the U.S. Open golf champion Payne Stewart, when his plane became a derelict because everybody died on it, how that we intercepted it with fighter jets right away? (It took of from Orlando, Florida, and was intercepted by the time it was over Memphis, Tennessee; and it was just a small civilian plane, how much more rapid attention should four hijacked Jumbo-jets have been given by the Air Force!  Excerpt from aforementioned article: "...The aircraft drifted off course shortly after it left Orlando, Florida, for Dallas . . . Air Force Capt. Chris Hamilton said there was nothing he could do when his F-16 caught up with the Learjet over Memphis, Tennessee.")

 

    How come four jumbo-jets weren't intercepted?  Why did NORAD stand down?  Why were most of our interceptor jets relocated North towards the Canadian border that day (on "war games"), and why did they not return? Why were there several scenarios (war games) played out that day, mimicking what was really happening?  Just like the London Subway bombings--they were running a drill that day that exactly mimicked what really happened.  Coincidence?  Stop it!

 

Below videos and photos courteously of:
Thermite and the WTC Collapses

This is what the International Judaics in control of our government won't allow "government investigators" to examine and/or comment upon; and that which was withheld from Americans by the so-called 911 Commission report (which was sold to America in bookstores).  And the 911 Commission did not even address Tower #7's total collapse in their official report.  Why?

Evidence of Thermate cutter-charges
(notice angled melted-through steel beams)

The core column shown above the firefighter was discovered after the collapse. The angled cut occurs in exactly the manner that shaped charges slice through steel beams to control the way they fall. Notice the hardened once liquid metal. Was thermite used with the shaped charge?

How Thermate cutter-charges work

More evidence of Thermate cutter-charges
Source: Shaped Charges and the World Trade Center Collapses

[SHORT VIDEO] The job of a shaped charge is to cut steel H-beams. "The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle which through a series of beams cut at the same angle will tend to make the building shift over and 'walk'"

WMV video download (670kB)

[SHORT VIDEO] "This is how it's been since day one...and this is six weeks later. As we get closer to the center of this it gets hotter and hotter - it's probably 1500 degrees."

 WMV video download (616kB)
[SHORT VIDEO] "Out on the rubble it's still, I believe, 1,100 degrees. The guys boots just melt within a few hours."

WMV video download (130kB)
[SHORT VIDEO] One of the more unusual artefacts to emerge from the rubble is this rock-like object which has come to be known as "the meteorite". "This is a fused element of molten steel and concrete all fused by the heat into one single element."
WMV video download (376kB)
 

For more videos and photos go to host Website:
 Thermite and the WTC Collapses

DR. STEVEN JONES- 9/11- THERMATE EVIDENCE PART 5
 (6:30 Min. long)

DR. STEVEN JONES- 9/11- THERMATE EVIDENCE PART 6
 (6:57 Min. long)

And for pilots:

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight in real time as it happens in the air traffic system on Sept. 11, 2001.

     The below video covers the lies about the Pentagon strike, the knocked-down light poles, the true altitude of flight 77 (over 300 feet too high to hit the Pentagon and light poles).  That is based on the NTSB's own flight data recorder reanimations. Then covers that the government-released video of "something" hitting the Pentagon wasn't a Jumbo-Jet.  Offers an animated scenario of a Cruise Missile being dropped from a military aircraft which overlies the Pentagon with the missile making the actual strike.  Shows that this is actually consistent with known info.  Interesting! (Note: The tape "skipping" stops after the first two minutes)

 (Video 1:04 Min.)

Also see a 16:24 Min. video: WTC7 ; The Smoking Gun of 9/11 (updated)

    Also, Tower #7 came down the same way that Towers #1 & #2 did—yet no plane hit Tower #7.  Those building were brought down by pre-placed explosives (actually they weren't explosives, per se, they were cutting charges which ignite and burn at super-hot temperatures and melt the steel beams.  That is why you don't hear explosions, per se; what you hear are the floors slapping down upon each other one at a time in sequence), the planes did not bring those buildings down.  I don't care what anybody says, I don't care what any traitor or useful idiot says, both within the media and government and without.

 

    Look into it and you will be convinced as well.  Look into the molten steel in the basements of those buildings SIX WEEKS AFTER the collapses!  Thermate (Thermite with sulfur)  burns hot enough to do that—Thermate in the basement near the base of the core columns, that is—but not jet fuel (which is a common Kerosene mix) eighty stories up!

 

    There is so much evidence that they were demolished.  They (building owner, the Judaic Larry Silverstein) even admitted to demolishing Tower #7 ("we had to 'pull it'", he said on video [it's on the Website, or watch HERE the 46 Second video]), even though there was not enough time to rig the 47 story building for that demolition. Tower #7 was “pulled” I think five hours after #1 & #2 came down―absolutely no time to rig all the main columns on the 47 story building—hundreds, maybe thousands of (burning/cutting—they are not explosive) charges!  Yet it was demolished in the same fashion, it came down like they were sisters.  Ergo, the charges were pre-placed there in Tower #7.  And if there, then also in #1 & #2.  And that (the pre-rigged Tower #7) accounts for the final destination of the last plane (Flight 93) that didn't hit its target, the one that was SHOT DOWN over Pennsylvania.

 

    And that is why they had to “pull” Tower #7, it was sitting there with all the evidence (explosives) in place just waiting to be discovered by NYC officials who would have had to inspect the building for safety before opening it to repairmen.  Imagine if workmen starting holding up Thermate bars with electrical wires hanging out for the media cameras saying, “Hey, look what we found in Tower #7 strapped to all the main support columns!  How did the terrorists get in here to place them…”  You get the idea; that’s why they had to "pull" Tower #7, to cover their crime, to destroy the damning evidence.

 

    Also of note regarding Silverstein's "Pull it" comments, he (or his spokesmen) then later tried to recant, saying that he meant to "pull the Firefighters out of the building"!  When a simple view of that video leaves absolutely no room for doubt that he meant to pull the building (down).  The term "Pull" is a demolition term for felling a structure.  So, he lied.  But the question is, Why did he lie?

 

    There really is no other way to look at it.  I consider it a done deal.  911 was an inside job.  And I have investigated it to my satisfaction, so much so that I really require no further proof, though I know that there is more proof coming in.  You just can’t do this magnificent of a deed and not leave any evidence behind.  That’s why they try to ridicule 911-Truthers―so that nobody will listen to them, and so that weak people, fearing like kind ridicule, will not following in their footsteps.

 

    I know that military men and good Americans don't want to believe that their government is complicit, not anymore than proud German soldiers and the decent Christian German citizens wanted to know Adolph Hitler's mad plans.  But blind loyalty does not change reality.

 

    America has been infiltrated at the highest levels and is being purposely suicided.

 

    And it's gonna die real soon.  Real soon.  It's all but dead on its feet as we speak.  And those soldiers of ours aren't ever coming home.  They will just be redeployed in a phase three country.  Watch for the Draft to start up—this time including females.  Watch for that.  Riots will follow the demonstrations that the Draft causes; a man will give his sons to war, but never his daughters.  Never.

 

    And watch most of all for another False-Flag "terrorist attack” in America.  It is coming.  What is holding them back is that, because of the Internet, everybody is watching their hands.  But it will come (I believe that there was at least one, maybe two, aborted attacks that were scrubbed at the last minute because the plans came out on the Internet [by defectors and change-of-heart'ers] before they occurred.)  And then watch for Iran or some other "axis of evil" nation to get blamed.  And then off we go again "regime-changing" for Israel and her International Judaic masters.

 

    Don't misunderstand that I am an anti-war type, I'm not.  But if the world is going to fall apart for wars, I'd rather be on the winning side; it will be a lot more comfortable—until the end, that is.  Look at it like this: wouldn't you rather be an American right now than an Iraqi? That's what I mean.

 

    And I am not here commenting on my opinion of what I want, or do not want, to happen; my personal wants and desires are irrelevant.  I am just chronicling the events as information shows itself.  And our interpretations must be allowed to change if and when new data presents itself.  But I know that this thing cannot be stopped.  It can just be survived by the wise and faithful.

 

    So, keep your mouth shut and your eyes open, and watch, and prepare.  (Not trying to bully you there, just giving good sound advice.)

 

PS:  I really could have gone on and on with the evidence above, there is so much that doesn't add-up regarding the “official story” of 911.  We didn't even talk about the Pennsylvania field and the disappearing Jumbo-Jet, or the Pentagon Super-liner with the wings that didn't go into the building but that aren't outside of it either.  These anomalies deserve further investigation, investigation that shall never be permitted by the you-know-who's.  So we are simply left to "guess," and getting tired of guessing, we forget.  Which was the plan all along.  Let's face reality here: Aren't you getting a little tired of hearing about 911 and conspiracies?

 

    So then, they won.

 

   And it was just that easy: ignore, deny, ridicule, confuse.

 

    Meanwhile, they are planning to do it again.  And when we revolt after catching them—because this time our eyes are wide open and we are ready for them—then they will place us under Martial Law by the Presidential Orders and Security Directives that they had Pres. Bush put into place within the last eight months or so, for "the good of the nations' continuity."

 

    We are being used to enslave ourselves, just like the Germans were in WWII and the Russians in 1917, etc., etc., etc.  Smart, aren't they?

Luke 16:8
8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.  KJV

    Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
__________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin
 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

2008 Presidential Candidate Ron Paul and American Politics

 

July 30, 2007.

A (female) reader writes:

Hi Mr. Goggin,
 
With the end times knocking at our door, and most everyone from world leaders to well known TV pastors trying their best to rush God's plans, I am concerned who will win the big seat come next election - IF there is another election.
 
Ron Paul seems like the man we need to run our country. However, I am a little worried that he may be just the man prophecy warns us about. Have you mentioned him in any of your postings that I may have over looked? I am very interested in what you think about him and if you may also be as concerned (about Dr. Paul) as I am.
 
Thank you for your time.
[Xxxxxx]


Answer: 

Hi [Xxxxxx].  I have been following Congressman (Texas - Republican) Ron Paul for some time now.  He is truly unusual; kind of a friend to those who know what is going on.  Therefore he hasn't a chance to be elected.  He has stated that he thinks another false-flag 911-type event is coming.  He has said that we should get rid of the Federal Reserve.  He isn't interested in systematically picking-off the countries that Israel can't play nice and get along with.

    Ron Paul is a strong Constitutionalist (believes in people's rights as contained in the unadulterated U.S. Constitution), he is Pro-Life (against Abortion), he is anti-Federal Reserve, and he is a Christian, having had once considered becoming a Lutheran minister (Source).  In other words, he is hitting close to the International Judaic's hearts, and one who holds dear all that those Judaics who control American politics hate.

Quote from Wikipedia Encyclopedia:
“In Congress, [Ron] Paul has adhered to limited government conservative and libertarian principles, often basing his positions on constitutionalism and states' rights. He voted against the USA PATRIOT Act, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the Iraq War. He has never voted to raise taxes or congressional pay and refuses to take government-paid junkets [unlike Senator Obama who went off finding his roots in Africa on the taxpayers dime]. He has earned the nickname "Dr. No" for voting against any bill he believes violates the Constitution.” — "Ron Paul" Wikipedia.  Source

    Definitely somebody that the International Judaic's can't work with (i.e., can't control)!  So, Ron Paul is kept on the fringe; he can't get into debates, he can't get airtime, he can't get the big-money Jewish PAC donations that all the other front-runners are getting.  In effect, "they" are keeping him out of the spotlight.  They say that he is in the single digits as far as electability (but "they" use those false polls to mold opinion and to utilize the "herd mentality" of people to steer them to and/or away from candidates and issues). 

    So, we are stuck with a Hillary Rodham (Mrs. non-Christian/pretend-Christian-when-it's-useful,  closeted Lesbian, crypto-Jew (blood related to the crypto-Jew Pres. F. D. Roosevelt), and Socialist/nigh Communist) Clinton, or a Barack Hussein (Mr. false-Christian, inexperienced and naive freshman Congressman and, my best qualification is that I'm half-Black) Obama.  My guess is that Hillary will win, because she has been proven to be controllable by the International Judaics who are hosting this (and all) U.S. Presidential Elections.  Obama hasn't been tested and might not do what he is told when the time comes and he gets drunk with "being the first African American President."  He's also dangerous to them because he isn't into war-mongering, and he really believes that he will be making his own decisions.  (Though Mr. Obama made the obligatory visit to Israel this year to bow before the Holocaust Memorial idol, as had already every other main 2008 Presidential contender.)

    If Ron Paul won (which he can't), he wouldn't last half as long as John F. Kennedy did, which was the last President to attempt to circumvent the Judaic's Federal Reserve banking cartel (ten Jewish banking families OWN the ten so-called "Federal" Reserve banks of America, which our unconstitutional Income Tax money is used to pay unending interest to).  JFK wanted to print our (America's) money based on Gold and Silver reserves, and apart from the privately-owned fiat-money Federal Reserve system.  JFK's second sin was his desire to abolish the Secret Societies in government, of which the Judaics are the absolute masters of, and is the hidden means of their control over Gentile Useful Idiots (Bush, Cheney, Kennedy, etc. et al).  His third sin was to try to reel in Israel and their Nuclear Weapons program.

    Vietnam had nothing to do with JFK's assassination—they could have just thrown up another false-flag (like the one they used [Gulf of Tonkin] to get us into Vietnam to begin with) and Kennedy would have not only left the troops there, but he would have sent more.  Kind of like what is going to happen with America when they give Bush another American False-Flag "911 type incident," as Ron Paul noted ON THE RECORD (but which was controlled-media ignored) in the House of Representatives in January 2007:

“Ron Paul stood on the floor of the House of Representatives and, in an open session, on the record, said, ‘A contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may well occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran’.” — "House Republican Fears False Flag Operation in Persian Gulf"  Cryptogon, January 14th, 2007 Source. Video of speech segment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRB3UBz1KEQ

    Even the "peace-party" Democrats are chomping at the bit to bomb Iran for their masters, the owners of the illegal and unbiblical Israeli State.  Those same Democrats who promised their Democratic voters to get the U.S. out of Iraq if they won the House and Senate, then after winning the majority in both houses of Congress, and under the chair of the  Democratic Speaker of the House, the Judaic Nancy Pelosi, they voted to send more troops to Iraq!  Now, I could care less about the Islamic Republic of Iran, so do not think that I wail because they are going to be attacked—I haven't had much favor for Iran since they took American hostages for 444 days on Christian-embarrassment President Jimmy Carter's watch—but I can see what the International Judaics "are up to" here.  So, if we are going to bomb Iran, let's just call it what it is—Israel's dirty work—and quit with the false pretexts.

    You make a wise observation in your first paragraph: "IF there is another election."

    And, as you suspected; if Ron Paul were elected, we would have to examine the possibility that he was a plant, or that by whatever blackmail he was now compromised.  Good eye, that's how you have to think to keep up with "them."  He truly is "too good to be true," and he is getting away with it!  I suspect that he may be unwittingly being used in a Ross Perot kind of tactic to later in the elections be utilized to weaken one of the main candidates by drawing from that candidate's voting base or by damaging that candidate during debates.  We will see, won't we? 

    Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
_______________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin
 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

On July 12, 2007, for the first time in 220 years, the United States Congress was opened with a prayer by a Hindu clergyman to his pantheon of false gods.
 


A reader writes:

Hello Nick, I heard that the US Senate had a Hindu do the opening prayer? I read just a quick something on it, but was wondering what that was all about. Never before has this ever happened in US history that I know of. I sure would like to read what was prayed.

Thanks for all you do!

[Xxxxxxx]


Answer:

Hello. Yes, it was terrible.  And we wonder why God is taking His hands off from protecting America!

    America was founded as a Christian nation, don't let anyone tell you different.  The fathers of this nation in their writings and diaries made it clear that America was to be a Christian nation and blessed of God because of that.  And we have been blessed. Until recently, that is.  Now, since the Judaics have gained control of this nation we are no longer a Christian nation, we are no longer a Godly nation.  We took God out of schools, government, and the public place.  Can we blame Him for going?

    The Judaics who want to usurp Jacob/Israel's birthright are making true-Israel (the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples) in America curse themselves, in an attempt to cause God to take His blessings off of this great nation founded by those true-Israel descendants, for sins against Him.  That is what this is all about—all of it!

    And now our Congress is closing their eyes and bowing their heads reverently, while some forehead-marked (see video) idolater jointly worships a pantheon (multitude) of Hindu gods.  Where the hell were our Christian leaders?  Where was God's Christian ministers objecting!  They have all become lukewarm and thereby have gone astray, taking their entire congregations down with them (look at the false preacher pastor John Hagee, for instance; the Judaized "Christian-Zionist"!).  God has no mainstream representatives in America or the Christian Western nations any more.  This is satan's world now, we are just living in it till the One and Only True Messiah Jesus Christ returns.  It is us, you and I and thousands likes us, grass roots, few, unheard, ridiculed, persecuted under Political Correctness and Diversity and Ecumenism, that stand by the Lord God of the Heaven and the Earth and His only Christ, the Messiah Jesus Christ of Nazareth, born of Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit; whom they slew, but who did raise Himself forevermore.  All the mainstream "Christian" churches have been infiltrated, diluted into irrelevance, and overthrown.  Shame, shame, shame!  "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.  For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." (Rev 18:4-5).

    Our ancestors, seeking to worship as we ought, fled Europe from the corrupt churches there to come to new land to live under the Lord—they came to America.  But the antichrist Judaics followed us here, and in two-hundred short years have corrupted us worse than old Europe (which they likewise infiltrated and destroyed of old) could have ever been,  And now we wait here upon God's wrath.  For now there is nowhere else for us to flee to; the world has been subdued by the adversaries and there is nowhere pristine left for us to start over in.

    Great Christian leaders of early America saw the antichrist spirit Jewish peril, and spoke of it; though the International Judaics have hidden those warnings today by rewriting history and burying truths.  Below is Benjamin Franklin addressing the Constitutional Congress in May 1787.  Sound familiar today?

“In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered it's moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded [by context he is saying that America also was founded as a Christian Nation like the following Christian European nations he compares us to ] by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call Palestine [note: not "Israel"]. But, Gentlemen, should the world today give it to them in fee simple ["free;" and it did on May 14, 1948] , they would at once find some cogent reason for not returning [the only "Jews" living in Israel are refugees, mostly from Russia]. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race [America gives multiple billions of dollars of "aid" to Israel every year, without which Israel could not survive (not to mention Israel's $60 billion, and counting, reparations from once-Christian Germany, the land of Martin Luther's Christian Great Reformation)].

If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution [the U.S. Constitution, adopted a month later on Sep 17, 1787] in less than 200 years [i.e., by 1987] they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government [i.e., from a Constitutional Republic to a "Democracy"] for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them sustenance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands ["The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender" Prov 22:7]. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations [Duet 23:3?]. A leopard cannot change it's spots [quoting Jeremiah 13:23]. Jews are Asiatics, they are a menace to this country if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution.”  — Benjamin Franklin, one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence, in a speech before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787 as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.

    Prophetic words; but unheeded.  And they did come here, and in droves, making this spiritually the new Babylon.  And they have taken over both financially and in the halls of every power, in media, government, education, social-change movements, and etc; and they have all but destroyed this Christian nation, last of all the Christian church.  America was the last land of refuge in the world where God's Christian peoples fled to whereby to set up a nation where God was Sovereign Lord, Jesus was King of kings, Lord of lords and Messiah Savior, and the religion was Christianity.  If there was somewhere to go, I would go there.  But there isn't.  And now we are stuck in this nation with it's perversion of Christianity, perversion of morals, and wholesale wickedness from the heights of government to the lowliest man on the street—abortion, vice, adulteries, sexual perversions normalized, dishonesty, idolatry, thievery, whoredoms, Mars hill, murders, blasphemies.  And what will we now do?

    Below is an encyclopedia definition of the Hindu pantheon of gods that America's great leaders publicly paid homage to (and by their solemn reverence being therefore a form of worship) this July 2007—OUR elected representatives, YOUR's, MINE—those whom WE tacitly approved of by casting our lot for them in elections and by submitting unto their authority.  If there was a man in that Congress that we voted for, and who did not object, did not noticeably get up and walk out, did not symbolically his back to the podium; but rather enabled and participated in this vile-to-God sin, then we too have blood on our own hands.

    And think not that God wasn't watching!  He saw.  He saw.  He heard the prayers going to another other than Him, and He can remember the day when the prayers of the U.S. Congress were sent up to Him, and when they meant it.  Thus, America as a nation is tempting God.  "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" (Ex 34:14).  And Jesus, confirming the words of God which were delivered before through all of His holy servants, said: "And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:  And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment." (Mark 12:29-30).

    Fools that would tempt God!  "And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." (Luke 4:12).  "Ye shall not tempt the Lord your God, as ye tempted him in Massah." (Deut 6:16).  "And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died." (Num 21:6).  "Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents." (1 Cor 10:9).

Hindu deities
Wikipedia Encyclopedia
Link

Within Hinduism a large number of personalities, or 'forms', are worshipped as deities or murtis. The belief is that these beings are either aspects of the supreme Brahman; Avatars of the supreme being (Bhagavan); or significantly powerful entities known as devas. The exact nature of belief in regards to each deity varies between different Hindu traditions and philosophies. Often these beings are depicted in humanoid, or partially humanoid forms, complete with a set of unique and complex iconography [idols] in each case. ...


Three Gentle Christians Appear in
 District of Columbia Superior Court

    Below is an article on the Senate Hindu invocation with a short video that shows some Christian heroes protesting this great sin (I have placed the video link below the article).  By the way, the Christians, whom the Judaic-controlled media slandered and degraded as "extremists," "activists," and the new pejorative "fundamentalists," were arrested.  God bless them, they have more courage and steadfastness than the whole of Christianity today!  I wish I had done what they did.  I wish that you had.  I wish that we all had.  We only get one chance to do it right.  How are you doing?

    I "wish" that I could be in Washington, in Washington, D.C.’s Superior Court on September 11, 2007, just to be present in that courtroom and to stand up silently from my seat in quiet support when those three Christian heroes are called up to the bench for their court case continuance.  Would to God that thousands of real Christians went there peacefully to stand up for the Lord God and His Messiah Jesus Christ, and to let the world know that there are still some Christians left in America, some real Christians, men and women who declare that this is, was, and shall be a Christian nation!

    But who shall stand for the Lord?  He who died for us has no help meet.

Christian Right Activists Disrupt Hindu Chaplain In The Senate  (And read the comments section at the end of the article to see how much America hates Christians, and bear that in mind when pondering on how America and the Christian West could allow antichrist/satan and his International Judaic minions to persecute Christians in the Great Tribulation (the great and terrible time of Jacob's Trouble)

Video title:  Christian extremists disrupt Hindu Senate invocation

(Video 1:38 Min. long.)

    I have a prayer:  Lord Jesus Christ please remember your faithful Christians when your wrath raises!  We are not a part of them or the many things that they do against you; but as righteous Lot was in Sodom, we also are stuck in a country and a world that is going their way and far from you, and we cannot stop it.  Therefore, please do not punish us when you are punishing them.  And do know that you have some down here that truly do love you, Messiah.  Strengthen us against the day!

2 Peter 2:6-9
6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:  KJV

      Peace to you in Christ Jesus.

PS:  Here is a link to a 6 Min. video by an India Christian living in the nation of India explaining the persecution of Christians in India by Hindus.  And he also makes some keen observations as to the result of America beginning to leave Christianity and God starting in the 1960's.  Interesting off-shore interpretation of America and her current trends and woes:  Hindu Prayer in US Senate: America in Spiritual Darkness

_______________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

Marriage, divorce, and "living in sin" in God's eyes

 

A reader writes:

Subject: Mother searching to live right
I am a mother of [a lot of] children.  My husband of [more than ten] years left me and [a lot of] children.  We divorced.  Shortly after that I became pregnant with [more than one child].  I know that I sinned.   I am living with the [the later children's] father.  I am committed to him but he does not show any interest in marriage.  I want  to live a Christian life.  My problem is should I leave or not.   We attend church and live as husband and wife.   He also loves my other children they look to him as a father .  Their [biological] father is not in their life.


Answer:

Hello.  Sounds like you got a good man, why leave him?  He's a Christian (harder and harder to find nowadays) and you said that you were committed to him and that the kids like him; why traumatize the kids by taking them away from another man?  Could it be that some self-righteous hypocrite in your church has been whispering in your ear about "living in sin" and divorce?  Let's examine their case.

    First of all, you are married to the new man in God's eyes.  In the Bible, in the old days the way that they got married was to perform the "marital act":

Gen 24:67
67 And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death.  KJV

    Today, in marriage we have legal documents and ceremonies either in a church or civilly through the courts.  But in God's eyes, when a woman "sleeps" with a man she just married him; and when (or if) she goes off and "sleeps" with another man then she has committed adultery.  The average woman today has had many husbands and doesn't even know it.

   However, I hasten to add: when a woman (or man) repents of their sin in Jesus Christ's name—they are washed clean by Christ's sacrifice and are no longer guilty in God's eyes for that sin.  This is important to emphasis because many (almost half) of all women today have had an abortion (murder), and they need to know that upon repentance they are washed clean because of who Jesus Christ was and because of what He did, and not because they do or do not deserve it themselves.  The bottom line is that in God's eyes, Jesus deserved it.  And Jesus confers that forgiveness upon us when we, believing upon Him, ask it of God in Jesus' name.  Only Christians have this help, all other shall stand Judgment Day with every single sin that they ever committed during their lives still on their soul.  And had not God made a way for man to be forgiven, there would be none in Heaven.  But other religions reject this ONLY WAY FROM GOD at salvation and are thus, needless to say, and to put it mildly, in great jeopardy on the Judgment Day that all man, both good and evil shall stand.  And it is before Jesus Christ, whom many have denied, that they shall stand.

John 5:19-28
19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
20 For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.
21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;
27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,  KJV

Men and women treated differently in the Bible

    Contrary to all the Feminist's hype, men and women are not the same.  And feminism is of satan, not God.  Feminism is against every precept in the Bible about male/female gender roles. 

    A woman was to be a virgin till her husband, and then remain true to him alone.  Men are not held so tight to one-woman based upon the whole concubine thing, which was never repealed.  A woman could never have a "male concubine" (there is no such thing).

    And also, nowhere in Scripture is a male ever referred to as a virgin.  But females are always identified by their marital/sexual status.  For instance, whenever a female is being directly addressed or referred to, as using a pronoun (maiden, woman, damsel, etc.) instead of by the use of her proper noun name (Mary, Eve, Rachel, etc.) they are (in the Hebrew and Greek definitions) either: children, virgins (maidens for "maiden-head" [hymen]), engaged ("espoused"—but not sexual! As was mother Mary's case before Jesus' birth), wives or concubines, widows, adulteresses, and whores.  Even when Jesus speaks to his mother in the Gospel of John He refers to her as "gune," a married woman:

John 2:3-5
3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.
5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. KJV

Woman: Greek word 31135  gune (goo-nay'); probably from the base of NT:1096; a woman; specially, a wife:  KJV - wife, woman.

    Now, while it is impossible to verify whether or not "married woman" as opposed to "single woman" (i.e., a virgin in Bible parlance) is being referred to for every case regarding "gune"—because most often not enough information in that regard is given in each case—it can be said that when a married woman is being referred to she is referred to as a "gune."  Sometimes gune is used to refer to a group of women, regardless of their individual marital status'.

    However, there is another Greek word that is never used of a married woman and is used to speak of unmarried women, that word is "thelus":

Rom 1:26-27
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature [these just happened to be Lesbians/Bi-Sexuals]:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly [these were Homosexuals/Bi-Sexuals], and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. KJV

Mark 10:6
6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. KJV

women, woman & female: Greek word #2338  thelus (thay'-loos); from the same as NT:2337; female: KJV - female, woman.

    Below is an excellent example of where the Holy Spirit was referring to a full grown woman who was yet a virgin, and therefore couldn't accurately in this context be referred to a gune:

1 Tim 5:14
14 I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. KJV

younger women: Greek word #3501  neos (neh'-os); including the comparative neoteros (neh-o'-ter-os); a primary word; "new", i.e. (of persons) youthful, or (of things) fresh; figuratively, regenerate:  KJV - new, young.

NOTE:  In the manuscripts, the above word (neos #3501) is rendered in the feminine gender (and in its plural form) which is why it looks different than its above base word.  It is helpful to know that a Strong's Concordance Dictionary only gives you the definition of any word in its basic form.  One needs to have access to the Greek (or Hebrew depending on the case) manuscripts to see what else is affixed to the word in any particular instance.  For instance, in English we might have "pizza," "pizza maker," or "pizzeria," and even a "female pizza maker;" but in a "Strong's-type" dictionary they would all list the base word pizza only and give you the definition of "pizza" alone.  Not the best example perhaps, but you get the point.  So, below is an Interlinear (manuscripts) look at that word, including an open pane with the Greek Parsing for the word.  We notice that in this particular case the word neos is in the feminine gender and also in the plural.  Observe:

    Also note that once a woman marries she is considered to be a gune, not because she took some wedding vow, but rather in that she lost her virginity.  This is why a woman  gune can also refer to a woman of an older age whereby it could be taken for granted that she was not a virgin, as women married young.  So the key is not on marriage, per sey; but rather on the changing of innocence, her participation in the "marital act" which defined her marriage in the first place.

    Continuing to drift off-topic here, let's look at the below Scripture (1 Cor 7:34-39) which I believe hammer home some of what I am trying to say.  In the below, Paul is speaking of chastity, he is not saying that it is a command of the Lord, but rather that he (Paul) discerns that one can be a better servant to God without all the hang-ups and strings attached to being married.  He begins the below with the admission that this Scripture is a not by commandment of God.  So don't anyone think that God is against marriage:

1 Cor 7:25
25 Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful. KJV

    As we move down towards our target Scripture (1 Cor 7:34-39) Paul again tells us that this is not a command of God:

1 Cor 7:35
35 And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but [rather, instead, the reason is] for that which is comely [noble, decorous (exercising decorum)], and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction. KJV

    This would be along the same lines as Jesus' eunuch discourse: "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb [born impotent medically]: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men [castrated males]: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs [abstained, remained chaste by choice] for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." (Matt 19:12).  And now our target Scripture:

    And my point in coming here is to show two things; one, that an unmarried woman is tantamount to being a virgin in the Bible, therefore, conversely,  a woman ceases being a virgin when she begins being married (i.e., engages in the marital act [sexual intercourse]).  And two, that a man may be "married" (actually ESPOUSED) to a woman and not yet have sex with her, but she is then not referred to to as his wife (like Jesus' stepfather Joseph), but rather as HIS virgin, as in ownership, dedication, faithfulness.  This is what "espoused" means in the Bible, and today we would call it "engaged" (but without the sexual activity that today's people do while being engaged to wed).  However, if that espoused man "takes his virgin" (i.e., in sexual intercourse) then she becomes his wife (like Joseph did with Mother Mary AFTER Jesus was born).  Observe:

1 Cor 7:34-39
34 There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.
35 And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction.
36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.
37 Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.
38 So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.
39 The wife [gune — not the "espoused" woman; i.e., not the pre-sex "engaged" woman] is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord. KJV

    In the Old Testament, in the Law (which has not been done away with, contrary to popular desires) an espoused woman was considered to be as a wife regarding the adultery laws, so that even though the engaged woman (espoused) was not yet a true wife by sexual intercourse, if another man had sex with her while she was in this relationship, he (and her) were punished according the adultery laws; i.e., they were both stoned to death.

Deut 22:23-27
23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed [engaged, espoused] unto an husband, and a man find her in the city [where many people would have heard her cry "RAPE" had she not been consenting (see verse 27)], and lie with her [sexual intercourse];
24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.
25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field [where help was presumably not available], and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die:
26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:
27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. KJV

    This is why, had (Jesus' stepfather) Joseph's suspicions been correct that Mother Mary was pregnant by another man, then Mary would have had to be punished by the law with death by stoning; and it is why Joseph—though despondent with the overwhelming evidence that his espoused (engaged, betrothed) Mary had been unfaithful (for she was pregnant and yet  Joseph had not had her)—in his love for her did not want her punished, but rather willed that she just be: "Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away [divorce] privily [privately, secretly]." (Matt 1:19).  That is to say, he didn't want to expose her sin whereby she would have been punished by the law (killed) nor humiliated as a whorish woman.

    Notice also that Joseph was referred to as her "husband" even though they were not "married" (i.e., sexually active): 

Matt 1:18-25
18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused [engaged, betrothed] to Joseph, before they came together [sexually, before they came together in sexual intercourse], she was found with child [pregnant] of the Holy Ghost [by the power of they Holy Spirit, by Divine intervention].
19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her [Mother Mary] a publick example [expose her sin/crime publicly], was minded [intended to] to put her away [divorce] privily [privately, secretly].
20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.
21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,
23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
24 Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife:
25 And knew her not [did not have sex with her] till [until AFTER] she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. KJV

    Some would say that the death penalty for adultery is too harsh, mostly adultery-minded people think this, but there was great wisdom in God's design.  God had a way that would have solved all our heartbreaks in our relationships, the "cheating," the betrayals.  However, man decided to cast God's Word aside and do as he pleased.  That is why most everybody reading this has been cheated-on at least one time by a girlfriend/boyfriend or even in many cases (over 50%-60%) by a husband/wife.  If we had kept God's law and the average Joe and Jane saw an adulterer publicly executed, we would have nary an adultery going on today.  But "we" did it satan's way and not God's way, and now look at all the heartbreak we all have tasted of!

Can men run around sleeping with lots of women today?

    However, a Biblical concubine is like a wife, she is a second wife, so the man has all the responsibilities of a husband to his concubine.  The concubine lived with the man just as the wife did, he raised her children, paid her way, and protected/provided for her all her days.  Her children were his children, having same legal status as the children of his wife.  For instance, Jacob/Israel had twelve sons who became the patriarchs of the twelve Tribes of Israel, by four different women at the same time—two wives and two concubines.  Jacob was also a wealthy man and was able to provide for them all.  In other words, this was not a "nightclub love 'em and leave 'em" type thing, as some men today try to justify their indiscretions with the "concubine excuse."  God is not fooled, men; and you only upset Him when you try.

    However, men today use these women like whores (which many of them are; the "Sexual Revolution" of the 1960's didn't liberate women, it separated them from God.  Satan did that through his agents in these "social movements.") and men are in transgression by that, because they were only using them and did not perform the duties and responsibilities of a husband.  And worse, by turning these women out as sex partners, these men then cause that woman to be an adulteress when she has her next sexual "partner," and the next, and next, etc. ad nauseam.  This is the meaning of the below Scripture:

Mark 10:11-12
11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.  KJV

    So do keep in mind that if you cheat on the man that you are with that it would fall under the adultery laws—even though you aren't "technically" married under the laws of your state.